What should you look for when choosing a backup solution?
We see confusion among IT professionals about the pros and cons of cloud-based object storage like Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure Blob. There tends to be a lack of general knowledge about smaller players like Back blaze B2. And wasabi, for example, and their benefits. Backup solution However, the most confusing is how to migrate data to various cloud storage solutions and how it can be done as quickly as possible.
After reading this blog, you should understand whether cloud storage is right for you and have a good idea of how you can move data into it. You’ll also see why File Catalyst is one of the best options for uploading/migrating data into cloud storage regardless of cloud vendor.
How to Increase You’re Rating on Spotify
How Risky Is Obsolete Software
3 Best Application to Make Your Website Secure In 2022
Revolutionizing Office Work with RPA Technology.
What this blog covers:
A brief overview of the advantages of public object storage.
Costs associated with cloud storage and transaction/issuing fees
How to move data to cloud storage
How File Catalyst Can Accelerate Cloud Migration
Let’s get started!
Issues with on-premises storage;
First, without going a ton of details, here are some of the main disadvantages of keeping your data in-house/on-premise:
High capital costs – You need to purchase storage hardware to maintain updates.
Physical space – You need shelves and a place to place them.
Energy (and cold) costs – not cheap when you start scaling.
IT Support Team – If you have a great IT team, if you don’t have.
Outdated Fast (Due to Data Growth) – You can drain capacity quickly.
data loss (Backup solutions cost more) – What is your backup strategy?
Advantages of Cloud Storage;
Ease of Access – Convenient web interface, lots of tools to move data in/out.
Lower cost of entry – you only pay for what you use.
Automated scales – no need to add storage space, unlimited capacity.
Operating Expenses – Pay only for what you can easily budget for.
No data loss – very redundant, no need to worry about drive failure.
Now that we have it, let’s take a look at how much it costs to use public cloud storage.
How much does it cost to store your data in cloud storage?
There are typically three types of fees for cloud-based object storage:
Storage Fee – This is the amount you pay to store your data per GB per month. Think of it as an actual locker that you rent at a local storage facility. You pay monthly for the size of the lockers you rent. In the case of cloud storage, you pay for the amount of data you store in gigabytes (GB).
However, unlike physical lockers, you only pay for what you use. And yet, unlike traditional lockers, there is no physical capacity. You can add as much data as you want and it will automatically scale to accommodate.
Egress’s Fees – Imagine if a physical storage company charges you to take your own stuff out of your locker? That’s what most cloud storage providers are doing, at least with larger ones. You store your data there and you pay to keep it there every month, then you pay to move it outside their network.
They don’t charge you to move within the network, i.e. access them with SaaS applications running in the same cloud. Migrating data to cloud storage is always free. Why? Since they need your data, you pay monthly to keep it there. But they want you to keep it there, so they usually charge you in GBs to take it out.
Transaction Fees – Most people tend to think in terms of storage costs themselves, possibly an outbound fee. But another hidden fee that many people don’t consider is transaction fees. These fees apply to operations such as PUT, GET, COPY, POST, or LIST requests. Some operations are performed by the client software you use to access and present your data in a nice user interface. And these can really add up.
*Currently from May 2022 backup solution ;
As you can see, there are quite a lot of them in price and making the right choice really comes down to your specific use case. Do you need a dedicated cloud or SaaS app to interact directly with your data? Are you looking for a place to store your stacks? Do you need to regularly move data out of your storage?
The big three providers, especially Amazon AWS, can take advantage of a phenomenon known as gravity data to guarantee higher fees This phenomenon allows them to charge more for the right to have your data close to their compute platform, which is an expansive marketplace ecosystem with a broad feature set. Not surprisingly, Backplane and Wasabi have the lowest cost and because They are “no-frills” storage, they have no market, no compute platform, and no cold storage. But what they do, they do it very well.
As for the Egress fee, this allows cloud providers to make their storage more sticky. If all your applications and data are in the same place and it takes a bit of luck to get them out, you are likely to stay. They have gone to great lengths to make the business case “switch” to another provider rejected by the huge cost of data migration.
Amazon and Microsoft are #1 and #2 in market share, understood to have a higher choice value than the only storage provider, while the smaller Backplane ($0.0 per GB) wa Sabi (no outing fee) charges very little or nothing to leave.
So why did you choose the big one instead of the less expensive one? It really depends on your use case. In 2018 AWS was the leader in cloud computing by a huge margin. Most software vendors if they don’t already have a SaaS solution hosted on AWS.
It makes sense to efficiently put your data where it can be accessed by your SaaS applications on AWS, such as in Amazon S3. You also know that many companies need to stay in touch with the leaders in this industry, you don’t have to be afraid of them disappearing.
On the other hand, if your only motivation is backup and you have a limited budget (and who doesn’t use it these days), why not use a vendor where you don’t pay enough to store or retrieve your data? If you calculate how much data you need to store, you’ll see huge savings if you use Wasabi or B2 background over Amazon S3 or Azure Blob.
Migrating data into cloud backup solution storage;
Amazon S3, Azure Blob, and Google Cloud Storage all have a proprietary REST API that can be used by the 3rd party to build a file transfer tool. There are also several 3rd-party tools that use the REST API to make the migration experience as comfortable as possible. Many other storage providers offer S3-compatible interfaces, so Amazon S3-compatible applications will automate with the storage.
Examples of available tool types include web interfaces, command line tools, 2-pane mapped drives, traditional data transfer programs, and backup/sync solutions.
Below is a list of some popular tools that can be used to connect to the cloud. I’m not going to evaluate each one. (You’re on the File Catalyst website after all.) But each has its own virtues that are good for different use cases.
Accelerated transfer to object backup solution storage;
Although there are several tools available that allow you to easily migrate data to cloud storage or to perform backup/restore/sync when you need to migrate large amounts of data, you should try File Catalyst if you want. move files or Data to cloud storage quickly.
While File Catalyst costs more than other applications, you probably don’t want to spend days, weeks, or months migrating to your cloud storage when it can. Very short, assuming you have high enough bandwidth.
How does File Catalyst differ from other programs? Other applications talk directly to S3 using HTTP, which can slow down a lot when network latency is present. (more on why this happened (Please click here for more details.) As a backup solution result, when you go further from a geographic location where object data is actually stored, the speed may drop considerably.
In case you can solve this problem because many of the tools mentioned above use parallel upload and multi upload to send a lot of data at once. Even if that’s the case, if you’re dealing with a high-speed network (like Gaps+) or a distant geographic location, you’re still not getting the best performance. ) File Catalyst is more efficient for larger files at higher bandwidth, while AZ Copy is as efficient as lower speeds or when data transfer involves many smaller files.
File Catalyst works using a proprietary UDP protocol. to speed up the furthest part of the network File Catalyst Server instances run in a compute platform close to object storage. The following diagram shows how to do it with AWS/EC2/S3.